Sunday, September 25, 2011
Friday, September 16, 2011
Nesbo's "Nemesis" stakes ground in Nordic Noir
Just when you think
you know what’s going on, you know you don’t. Such are the twists in Norwegian
crime writer Jo Nesbo’s Nemesis.
Solutions are always just out of the mind’s grasp – and there may be
double or triple possible answers for the intertwining investigations detective
Harry Hole pursues.
A masked man enters a bank and when the money is not withdrawn fast enough, he shoots a teller. Robbery becomes murder. Both crime and robbery divisions of the Oslo police investigate.
After an evening visiting ex-lover Anna, Harry, a recovering alcoholic, wakes up at home vomiting with no memory, and no mobile phone. Anna is found shot to death. While others deem the death a suicide, Harry secretly pursues it as a crime, with himself as a possible suspect. Intrigue deepens when Harry starts receiving cryptic e-mail messages from someone who has knowledge of his visit.
Two more unsettling deaths occupy the background: that of Harry’s former partner, Ellen, and that of colleague Beate Lonn’s father, a police officer shot during a robbery years before.
Tall, athletic, pushing 40, and full of flaws, Harry ranks as the best investigator on the Oslo force. As a result he’s resented by some colleagues, protected by the Crime division boss, Bjarne Moller, and valued for his unconventional methods by the Chief superintendent who confidentially gives him free rein when the robberies continue and the search for the perpetrator dubbed “the Expeditor” appears to be going nowhere.
Harry’s self-described vices include smoking, lying and holding grudges. Holding grudges is a motivating force in his pursuit of justice. (His least attractive trait is his name. Intentional humor or translation fluke? ) Harry’s virtues include the dogged pursuit of justice, loyalty, craftiness and a sweet devotion to and tenderness for his girlfriend, Rakel, and her young son, Oleg, who are away in Moscow in the midst of a contentious custody battle.
Other characters come with their own well-defined personalities complete with quirks:
There are fellow police officers.
Beate Lonn, a woman so unremarkable Harry thinks upon meeting her that if he turned away for a second he would forget what she looked like, becomes the officer in robberies unit he will work most closely with. Small, plain, pallid, her oddity is a remarkable enhanced Fusiform gyrus, that part of the brain that specializes in facial recognition. Hers allows her to recognize all the faces she has ever seen and remember them forever. (Does she also possess enhanced memory?)
Egotistical, blonde, blue-eyed, always tanned Rune Ivaarson struts in as head of robberies unit. He grates so on Harry that Harry covertly finds a way to ditch him and work a parallel investigation with just Beate. Ivaarson’s wits do not match his looks. His is a minor league ego compared to the slimy, but very smart, Tom Waaler, who’s been told he looks like David Hasseloff from Baywatch -- the same chin, body and smile. Waaler appears as if he is God’s gift to women but operates as if women are God’s gift to him.
There are the victims and their survivors.
Anna, a mediocre artist who lives fully, provides a sexy Bohemian to the plot. Many lovers have been drawn in by her slim curvaceous body, dark, husky laugh and indecent lips. A few wrinkles and strands of gray hair suggest fading vitality
The bank teller Stine Grete’s grieving widower, Trond Grete picks up the role of madman for a time. He’s so distraught he plays tennis alone in the rain following her death, and is subsequently treated for a breakdown.
Perhaps the most wily among this crafty cast is self-imprisoned gypsy, Raskol Baxnet, master bank robber, illusionist, unpredictable chess player, and wily philosopher of revenge. He cites Sun Tzu’s Art of War, a book he says is about the art of winning conflicts or getting what you want at the lowest possible price. Using sleight of hand, he proves a good manipulator can make you believe that a money bill is a knife’s edge. He, like Harry, lies and hold grudges and honors his promises. Noble in character, he settles scores adhering to a personal code outside the law. Harry follows his example finding a haven from pursuit in prison, if only for a visit.
U.S. armchair travelers like me may enjoy becoming familiar with Oslo’s chilly weather, streets, and temperament. We are also treated to an exotic journey to a community in Brazil where wanted criminals and shady characters from all over the world can live a safe, clandestine existence ignored by local officials for a price.
Jo Nesbo’s plot layers, repeats images, uses doubles and foils creating patterns almost geometric through reflections. It’s as if we are seeing the pieces of truth, not as parts of a puzzle piecing together but through the lens of an ever-shifting taleidoscope, the kaleidoscope cousin that mirrors what it’s pointed at. We may be dazzled with the ever changing splinters of possibility, even as we yearn to see the patterns resolve into the full picture beyond.
Such reflections are applied not just to events, but also to the familial relationships of characters. Characters double and recombine as family ties bind, shift and break into surprising patterns.
And finally the taleidoscope aims at the book’s theme, “Nemesis,” and revenge in its spectrum of forms: settling scores, retaliation, retribution, justice. Nesbo explores revenge as motive and motif. Nemesis is the name of the work of art Anna hopes to be remembered for: a triptych lighted by a lamp whose base is figurine depicting Nemesis, the goddess of revenge. Nemesis recurs as code and as part of the larger arc of the series.
Revenge as theme is explored as a psychological concept: A psychologist Harry consults suggests suicide is often a form of revenge. Harry catches a bit of television punditry and a philosopher and a social anthropologist discuss revenge as a political concept. One says: “A Country like USA, which stands for certain values like freedom and democracy, has a m has moral responsibility to avenge attack on its territory as they are also attacks on its values. Alone the desire for retaliation – and the execution of it – can protect such a vulnerable system as democracy.” Revenge is discussed religiously: “The lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead. God as Nemesis. Harry references revenge in a discussion of Aristotle’s aesthetic principle of catharsis. Finally revenge is seen as the raison d’etre for Harry’s profession: Humanity and society, we are told, can’t survive without it.
While the book knits the many plots and subplots to a satisfying conclusion, one large end remains loose, as yet beyond Harry’s and the reader’s reach – Harry’s Nemesis. For the reader the loose end becomes reason to continue in the series. Like others, I have not read the books currently available in translation in their sequential order: The Redbreast, Nemesis, Devil’s Star, The Redeemer, The Snowman, The Leopard. I will go back and fill in with Redbreast before proceeding.
With the enormous success of the Millenium Series and the death of Steig Larsson, American publishers and readers are hungry for more in the genre I recently saw referred to as “Nordic noir.” Nesbo stakes his ground at the top of this niche. The best part: He’s alive and writing.
A masked man enters a bank and when the money is not withdrawn fast enough, he shoots a teller. Robbery becomes murder. Both crime and robbery divisions of the Oslo police investigate.
After an evening visiting ex-lover Anna, Harry, a recovering alcoholic, wakes up at home vomiting with no memory, and no mobile phone. Anna is found shot to death. While others deem the death a suicide, Harry secretly pursues it as a crime, with himself as a possible suspect. Intrigue deepens when Harry starts receiving cryptic e-mail messages from someone who has knowledge of his visit.
Two more unsettling deaths occupy the background: that of Harry’s former partner, Ellen, and that of colleague Beate Lonn’s father, a police officer shot during a robbery years before.
Tall, athletic, pushing 40, and full of flaws, Harry ranks as the best investigator on the Oslo force. As a result he’s resented by some colleagues, protected by the Crime division boss, Bjarne Moller, and valued for his unconventional methods by the Chief superintendent who confidentially gives him free rein when the robberies continue and the search for the perpetrator dubbed “the Expeditor” appears to be going nowhere.
Harry’s self-described vices include smoking, lying and holding grudges. Holding grudges is a motivating force in his pursuit of justice. (His least attractive trait is his name. Intentional humor or translation fluke? ) Harry’s virtues include the dogged pursuit of justice, loyalty, craftiness and a sweet devotion to and tenderness for his girlfriend, Rakel, and her young son, Oleg, who are away in Moscow in the midst of a contentious custody battle.
Other characters come with their own well-defined personalities complete with quirks:
There are fellow police officers.
Beate Lonn, a woman so unremarkable Harry thinks upon meeting her that if he turned away for a second he would forget what she looked like, becomes the officer in robberies unit he will work most closely with. Small, plain, pallid, her oddity is a remarkable enhanced Fusiform gyrus, that part of the brain that specializes in facial recognition. Hers allows her to recognize all the faces she has ever seen and remember them forever. (Does she also possess enhanced memory?)
Egotistical, blonde, blue-eyed, always tanned Rune Ivaarson struts in as head of robberies unit. He grates so on Harry that Harry covertly finds a way to ditch him and work a parallel investigation with just Beate. Ivaarson’s wits do not match his looks. His is a minor league ego compared to the slimy, but very smart, Tom Waaler, who’s been told he looks like David Hasseloff from Baywatch -- the same chin, body and smile. Waaler appears as if he is God’s gift to women but operates as if women are God’s gift to him.
There are the victims and their survivors.
Anna, a mediocre artist who lives fully, provides a sexy Bohemian to the plot. Many lovers have been drawn in by her slim curvaceous body, dark, husky laugh and indecent lips. A few wrinkles and strands of gray hair suggest fading vitality
The bank teller Stine Grete’s grieving widower, Trond Grete picks up the role of madman for a time. He’s so distraught he plays tennis alone in the rain following her death, and is subsequently treated for a breakdown.
Perhaps the most wily among this crafty cast is self-imprisoned gypsy, Raskol Baxnet, master bank robber, illusionist, unpredictable chess player, and wily philosopher of revenge. He cites Sun Tzu’s Art of War, a book he says is about the art of winning conflicts or getting what you want at the lowest possible price. Using sleight of hand, he proves a good manipulator can make you believe that a money bill is a knife’s edge. He, like Harry, lies and hold grudges and honors his promises. Noble in character, he settles scores adhering to a personal code outside the law. Harry follows his example finding a haven from pursuit in prison, if only for a visit.
U.S. armchair travelers like me may enjoy becoming familiar with Oslo’s chilly weather, streets, and temperament. We are also treated to an exotic journey to a community in Brazil where wanted criminals and shady characters from all over the world can live a safe, clandestine existence ignored by local officials for a price.
Jo Nesbo’s plot layers, repeats images, uses doubles and foils creating patterns almost geometric through reflections. It’s as if we are seeing the pieces of truth, not as parts of a puzzle piecing together but through the lens of an ever-shifting taleidoscope, the kaleidoscope cousin that mirrors what it’s pointed at. We may be dazzled with the ever changing splinters of possibility, even as we yearn to see the patterns resolve into the full picture beyond.
Such reflections are applied not just to events, but also to the familial relationships of characters. Characters double and recombine as family ties bind, shift and break into surprising patterns.
And finally the taleidoscope aims at the book’s theme, “Nemesis,” and revenge in its spectrum of forms: settling scores, retaliation, retribution, justice. Nesbo explores revenge as motive and motif. Nemesis is the name of the work of art Anna hopes to be remembered for: a triptych lighted by a lamp whose base is figurine depicting Nemesis, the goddess of revenge. Nemesis recurs as code and as part of the larger arc of the series.
Revenge as theme is explored as a psychological concept: A psychologist Harry consults suggests suicide is often a form of revenge. Harry catches a bit of television punditry and a philosopher and a social anthropologist discuss revenge as a political concept. One says: “A Country like USA, which stands for certain values like freedom and democracy, has a m has moral responsibility to avenge attack on its territory as they are also attacks on its values. Alone the desire for retaliation – and the execution of it – can protect such a vulnerable system as democracy.” Revenge is discussed religiously: “The lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead. God as Nemesis. Harry references revenge in a discussion of Aristotle’s aesthetic principle of catharsis. Finally revenge is seen as the raison d’etre for Harry’s profession: Humanity and society, we are told, can’t survive without it.
While the book knits the many plots and subplots to a satisfying conclusion, one large end remains loose, as yet beyond Harry’s and the reader’s reach – Harry’s Nemesis. For the reader the loose end becomes reason to continue in the series. Like others, I have not read the books currently available in translation in their sequential order: The Redbreast, Nemesis, Devil’s Star, The Redeemer, The Snowman, The Leopard. I will go back and fill in with Redbreast before proceeding.
With the enormous success of the Millenium Series and the death of Steig Larsson, American publishers and readers are hungry for more in the genre I recently saw referred to as “Nordic noir.” Nesbo stakes his ground at the top of this niche. The best part: He’s alive and writing.
Thanks to Amanda for
suggesting this author.
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Cost of Knowledge In Caleb's Crossing
1263
There is no Frigate like
a Book
To take us Lands away,
Nor any Coursers like a
Page
Of prancing Poetry --
This Traverse may the
poorest take
Without oppress of Toll –
How frugal is the Chariot
That bears a Human soul.
---- Emily
Dickinson
Geraldine Brooks’ latest frigate bears us effortlessly into the 17th
century past of Martha ’s Vineyard and Harvard College via research and imagination
in her novel “Caleb’s Crossing.” Using the historical figure, Caleb Cheesahteauhmauk
, Harvard’s first Native American graduate (class of 1665) as a springboard,
Brooks invents early American profiles in courage.
For such traverses,
like sea crossings at the time, come with much “oppress of Toll,” for the hero,
Caleb, and narrator, Bethia Mayfield, as they attempt the precarious journeys
of book learning and cross-cultural experiences.
Caleb, a Wampanoag, defies a powerful relative and learns the language, customs
and beliefs of the English settlers’ by living among them, studying their books
and attending Harvard College. Bethia, a minister’s daughter, surreptitiously
wanders the island, sneaks books and silently learns Wampanaontoaonk speech, as
well as rudimentary Latin, Greek and Hebrew, by listening to lessons given to men
--lessons scandalous for a woman.
Both venture
into forbidden realms and pay the price.
Young Bethia believes the price is her soul. In the opening pages, written
when she is 15, living in Great Harbor, she tells the reader, “I killed my
mother,” by which she means she believes her mother’s death is God’s
retribution for her sins.
“I broke the commandments day following day. And I did it knowingly. Minister’s daughter: how
could I say otherwise? Like Eve, I thirsted after forbidden knowledge and I ate
forbidden fruit. For her, the apple, for me, the white hellebore – different
plants, proferred from the same hand. . . .
We are taught early here to see Nature as a
foe to be subdued. But I came by stages, to worship it. You could say for me,
this island and her bounties became the first of my false gods, the original
sin that begot so much idolatry.
She comes by her independent spirit and rebellion against rigid Puritan
codes by example; family members present mixed messages. Her grandfather settles on the island
community breaking off from the strict and punitive Massachusetts Bay Colony. In
public, Bethia’s mother cultivates silent listening and picking up information. At home with her children she tells stories
about foreign lands and strange ways. Bethia’s father’s teaches her only what’s
appropriate for a girl—her catechism. When he discovers he has learned her
brother’s lessons by listening in, he tells her “You risk addling your brain by
thinking on scholarly matters that need not concern you. It is not seemly for a
wife to know more than her husband.” Nevertheless, in his will he leaves her
his Homer and Hebrew Bible. Bethia’s father also preaches to the natives, stands
up to the xenophobe in his congregation and even takes in Caleb to live under
his roof.
Bethia begins her tale on the eve of the day Caleb is to live with them,
to join her brother Makepeace, and another Wampanoag Islanderunder the tutelage
of her father. As she describes events that led to this moment, a moment she is
partly and secretly responsible for, she says her first sin was disobedience. At
12 she went into the island wilderness alone where she met Caleb. He taught her the island’s secrets – such as
how and where to berry and fish, while she, in turn, taught him reading, speaking
and the beliefs of her religion. Entranced by his customs, she also dabbledin
encounters with pagan ceremonies and intoxicating spiritual substances.
The death of her mother is followed by others that she will likewise
attribute to divine punishment for transgressions and/or intervention by Satan.
Caleb also loses relatives. Spurred
by those deaths as well as curiosity and intellectual talent, he is less
conflicted in his ventures across cultures. He reveals to Bethia just before
they both set off for Cambridge why he seeks knowledge of the powerful English
god, and the settler’s books despite disapproval of his uncle, a powerful spiritual
healer.
The second section Bethia writes at age 17 in Cambridge which according
to Bethia is “an unlovely town.” It also stinks. “There was a reek of beasts
from the Ox-Pasture and the Cow Common, a rich tidal stink of rot and decay,
and a stench such as comes from people pressed in close habitation.”
Bethia accompanies her brother to Mr. Corlett’s School, a preparatory school for nearby
Harvard College. Bethia works as an indentured servant in exchange for
Makepeace’s fees, cleaning and waiting on the young scholars. Caleb and Joel
also attend the school; their way is paid by English benefactors who wish to
convert the Indians. It’s cold. The boys must drink only weak beer because the
water is brackish and they bathe in an outside trough. Homemade soap is difficult to come by. The
boys eat off wooden plates. Nevertheless, the boys find a way to distinguish between the well to
do and the less so. The most privileged
are the “pewter platers” so named because they have brought pewter tankards and
trenchers, engraved with their initials, so they don’t have to eat off the worn
wooden ones the common students use.
Following her years at the prep school, Bethia
chooses to work in the Buttery at Harvard,
where she can also listen in on
lectures. Once again we get a very different view of elite education: students
are not allowed to use the books in the library; only lecturers and tutors;
young men crowd into a leaky, drafty ruin of a dormitory and many pay part of
their board in goods – cows, shoes and firewood. The best building, made of bricks, was built
with British funds from Society for the Propagation of the Gospel to the
Indians to be used as the Indian College. (In time, Harvard’s president finds a
way of subverting this original intent for use by the settlers.)
While Caleb negotiates prejudice
and discrimination and proves his scholarly mettle, Bethia negotiates marriage
offers discovering along the way that arguing and swearing an oath at her
brother to whom she is subservient is an offense punishable by the courts.
The final section is written in Great Harbor when Bethia is 70. Her own
passages almost complete, she feels compelled to take up her pen and finish Caleb’s
story, calling him a hero for having the courage to challenge what others thought
was unthinkable – crossing into another culture.
No such prohibitions held back author Brooks as she researched and wrote,
though a few she consulted were guarded about her work. Some current tribal
members, says Brooks, “have been frank in expressing reservations about an
undertaking that fictionalizes the life of a beloved figure and sets down an
imagined version of that life that may be misinterpreted as factual. She attempts in her afterword to address
reservations by setting the historical record straight and “distinguishing
scant fact from rampant invention.”
Much
of the grace of her book comes from the way she blends specific facts and
general research about the period with skillful invention. Like Bethia, we easily pick up and adapt to
the language as we eavesdrop on unfamiliar words like “salvages (for savages),
somewhen, sennights, tegs, and sonquem, and turns of phrase: “He brims
like a stream in spate, gathering all the knowledge.” How smoothly we cross into this world Brooks creates. There are
rich descriptions of place and references to historical figures of the time ---
the poet Anne Bradstreet, the heretic
Anne Hutchinson, Govs. Danforth and Winthrop as well as early Harvard figures
like Chauncy. We never feel the story becomes an occasion for a history lesson;
rather the narrative holds us in its present, unfolding events fluently, as it
transports us to another world in another time.
By book’s end we may remind ourselves that even today many vilify those
who worship different Gods and knowledge can come at great cost. But Brooks’ chariot
confirms the cost of ignorance is greater.
Nathaniel Hawthorne said of nearby Boston of 1642 that it owed its state
of development to the “sombre sagacity of age; accomplishing so much precisely
because it imagined and hoped for so little.” Hester Prynne’s sin in “The
Scarlet Letter” was adultery, but her transgression was that she thought,
imagined and hoped outside her time. What
we allow into our heads matters. But what we allow ourselves to imagine also
matters. Both knowledge and imagination
are luxuries struggling communities sometimes seem little able to afford. It may take two young people who embrace the
pursuit of knowledge and the invention of the imagination for change to begin
to happen.
I’m glad that Caleb Cheesahteauhmauk and Bethia Mayfield had the courage to
cross cultures.
I’m also
glad Geraldine Brooks indulged her inquiring and imaginative mind to give us
such a satisfying armchair journey. For me the ride was not just frugal, but free;
a friend passed along the book.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)