Sunday, February 12, 2012

Sunday Salon: Toes wet

Good morning Sunday Salon,

                New to the waters of the Facebook group, Sunday Salon, I am wading –getting my toes wet.  I admire the ease with which others engage in casual book talk in the Salon, and find I am often more comfortable writing something a little more formal – not quite a full essay but a little more than conversation with friends. So I’m trying something a little more chatty.
               I am slow and getting slower it seems. It has taken me a little more than six months to figure out how to find blogs I like to read and I still don’t have it down.  Apart from loyal friends, family and a handful of new acquaintances, I haven’t a clue as to who reads mine. Audience. How do you know who your readers are? And how does that shape your writing?  It all seems so random.
               Years ago, I read a farewell letter from the publisher and founder of a great, issues-driven alternative newspaper. He was leaving the paper, he said, because he no longer knew who his readers were. That made sense to me. One of the first rules of writing, I had been taught, was know your audience.
                But when I began blogging I told myself audience didn’t matter. I would just write and see what happened. That hasn’t quite worked either. I’m still confused and tentative. It doesn’t help that on many days my stats tell me I have more hits from the Netherlands than from the U.S. Maybe it’s all the Nordic Noir I have been writing about.
     Last week I struggled with my writing. I completed a piece on Jesmyn Ward’s Salvage the Bones, a book I very much liked.  I also finished Julian Barnes The Sense of An Ending, another great book that will likely take me some time to think and write about, my self-imposed assignment for this week. 
              So given that labor, I decided to switch from literary fiction, back to more page-turning Nordic Noir. I’ve just begun Jussi Adler-Olsen’s The Keeper of Lost Causes. 


6 comments:

  1. I've been slow to respond to your last post, but your review prompted me to turn away from inter-library Kindle loans and into requesting a real live book! I want to read Salvage the Bones very much. Hadn't heard of it, of course, as I only look for free stuff and that is usually OLD. You keep me current, friend! As for blogging--traditionally, as I hear, it is a long and lonely and uncertain time in the beginning of the blogosphere. Most people say that. I just got lucky with a recommendation from Kate, otherwise I would still be talking to myself here. And, also, I have the benefit of visuals--photos require less contemplation for the visitor. You are doing a great job. Keep it up!! xo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you will really like Salvage the Bones. I ordered the book you suggested from Amazon as it is supposed to be issued in paperback this month, but it still has not arrived. I am trying to be current in my reading though I may dip into some older books soon.

      Delete
  2. The reason I started my book blog was so one day, my kids or grandkids would have a point of reference if they were interested in what is probably the most important part of me, aside from parenting, and that is my reading. I would love to have known if anyone among my ancestors was the reader I am and if so, what did he or she read and why. Given that as my reason, I don't really pay attention to who does or doesn't read what I've written. I do try to respond in kind to readers and/or commenters by reading and/or commenting on their blogs, but I keep the blog for myself and for my family. I've enjoyed finding your blog through the Sunday Salon. Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Amy. I think writing for the family is a good reason to write. I like your blog too. I will keep checking in.

      Delete
  3. I am hoping to a hold on Julian Barnes' new book soon! I have heard so many good things about the book (I am not going to read your review so I don't get spoiled!) and I hope that the people in front of me in the line for the book (I have it on hold) read it fast so I can get my grubby little fingers on them (actually they aren't that small; they are as big as most men's hands).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for your comment. It's a great book. So deceptively short. It took me all week to gather my thoughts about it. What is most strange to me is that sometimes I read a book and don't find any of the characters sympathetic so I don't engage well with the book. Here, towards the end I don't like the main character, but I love the book.
    Interesting.

    ReplyDelete